评论
打印
This is a little better established
人们对这个问题了解得更加清楚一些
especially since the sleep duration questions
特别是当睡眠长短
don't tend to probe for problems maybe
不再作为判断睡眠障碍的标准时
But this is relatively well replicated
但答案也是相似的
that minorities tend to be more likely
也就是少数裔人种比白人
to be short sleepers than whites
睡眠时间更短
In the black group
而对于黑人来说
whether you are more likely to be short or long sleeper
无论你的睡眠时间长还是短
this is something that's been seen a number of different times
这种情况更是非常的常见
looking going back to that CRP data
再看看CRP数据
If you actually look at, so we saw that nice U shape
我们可以看到一个完美的U型图
but that U shape depends on race and ethnicity
但U的形状仍然取决于人种
So we see that U shape in the white group
我们看到白人群体呈现出U型
and the Hispanic and Latino group
而西班牙裔和拉丁裔人群
there was actually no elevation of CRP
无论他们的睡眠长短如何
in any sleep duration group
CRP都没有上升的趋势
In the black African American group
而对于非洲裔美国人来说
there is a short sleep effect
存在一个短期睡眠效应
There was 8-hour effect that was also interesting
有一个有趣的8小时效应
And the Asian group
而亚裔人群中
you see a totally different pattern
你会看到一个完全不同的趋势
where you see a more of a linear effect
CRP和睡眠长短之间
between CRP and sleep duration
存在一个更加明显的线性效应
So you have very different stories here
所以每个人群的情况不同
So when you lump all these groups together
如果将这些人群合在一起
you might get an interesting U shape
可能会得到一个有趣的U型
but there's more of the story
但这又属于另一种情况了
Then the question is
所以这里出现的问题是
does this mean that CRP is the bad marker?
CRP是不是一个不良标志物?
Well, no
不是的
anything I would say at least
至少从我们有限的已知情况而言
we know what the limitations are
答案是否定的
I mean any marker that we look at
我们关注的任何标志物
we may find these sorts of differences stratifying
都会因为性别和人种
by gender and by race
而出现差别分化
