手机APP下载

您现在的位置: 首页 > GRE > GRE阅读 > GRE阅读每日一题 > 正文

GRE阅读理解(Barron模考)每日一题 第18期

来源:可可英语 编辑:mike   可可英语APP下载 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet

The tale of Piltdown Man, the most infamous forgery in the contentious detective story of the origins of mankind, began in 1912. On December 18 that year Charles Dawson, a well-known amateur British archaeologist, and Arthur Smith Woodward, of the British Museum of Natural History, announced the discovery of some amazing human fossils. The remains comprised nine pieces of skull, a broken jaw with two teeth in place, a few stone tools, and some animal bones, all of which had been discovered on a farm near Piltdown Common in Sussex.

When pieced together the skull looked distinctly human. Although Piltdown Man, as the hominid became known, had unusually thick bones, the brain case was large and rounded. There was no sign of prominent brow ridges or other apelike features. However, the shape of the jaw bone resembled that of an ape. The only human characteristic of this jaw was the wear on the two molars, which were ground down flat, as is frequently true of hominids who eat tough or abrasive foods, such as seeds. In other words the creature had the jaw of an ape and the skull of Homo sapiens. The primitive stone tools found with these remains suggested a remote age for Piltdown Man, perhaps the Early Pleistocene or even the Late Pliocene. (In 1912 experts thought the Pliocene lasted from 1 million to 600 000 years ago. Scientists now date it to between 5 million and 1.7 million years ago.) This date was also supported by some animal bones found with Piltdown Man. To most scientists of the time, Piltdown Man fulfilled a prediction made by the pioneering evolutionist Charles Darwin, who had believed that humans and the apes could be connected genetically through a still undiscovered creature. Most significantly, it was half-human in precisely the feature that was then accepted as the most important difference between humans and the apes - the brain. At this time there was little fossil evidence to contradict the idea that the brain was among the first of the human features to evolve. As time went on, however, Homo erectus fossils were found in Java and China, while in South Africa the australopithecines were being discovered. All these fossils had human-like jaws and teeth and relatively small brains in contrast to Piltdown Man's large cranium and apelike jaw. The large brain simply did not fit with the rest of the fossil evidence. By 1948 scientists knew that bones buried in the earth gradually absorb fluorine. The older a bone, the more fluorine it contains. When the Piltdown materials were tested for fluorine, the skull and jaw fragments turned out to be much younger than the Early Pleistocene animal bones with which the skull had been found.

Scientists were now very suspicious. In 1953 all the Piltdown material was tested for its authenticity. Not only was the recent age of the jaw and skull confirmed, but the jaw proved to be that of a modern orangutan, with the teeth filed down in a quite obvious manner to imitate wear on human teeth. But the forger had not stopped there. A bone tool found with the remains had been made in recent times with a steel knife, which leaves different marks than does a stone flake or axe. The tools, as well as the animal bones, had been taken from different archaeological sites.

Once the forgery was exposed by modem scientific analysis the mystery was no longer where Piltdown Man came in human evolution but who was responsible for the hoax, and why? Although Dawson, the discoverer of most of the Piltdown material, is frequently singled out as the person responsible for this practical joke, there is no definite proof and the question is far from settled.

The Piltdown skull seemed distinctly human because it had (Select ALL answer choices that apply)
A.a large brain
B.thick bones
C.brow ridges

The scientists of the time made which of the following mistakes
A.believed that fossil discoveries would reveal much about human origins
B.had preconceived ideas about what features an early hominid should have
C.followed the ideas of Darwin in the face of counterevidence
D.incorrectly judged the size of the brain
E.failed to examine other fossil evidence available at the time

The animal bones found buried with the Piltdown Man were all of the following except
A.shown to be genuinely Pleistocene
B.more recent than first thought
C.unconnected with the human remains
D.deliberately planted at the site
E.not originally from the Piltdown site


It can be inferred that it took so long to expose the forgery because
A.the forger was exceptionally clever making it difficult to detect the alterations
B.reliable techniques for dating rocks did not exist until recently
C.the bones were not subjected to close scrutiny until considerable contradictory evidence accumulated
D.the scientists had no reason to doubt the credibility of the team who made the discovery
E.similar fossils from other archeological sites had proved to be genuine

重点单词   查看全部解释    
undiscovered

想一想再看

adj. 未被发现的;未勘探的

 
contradictory [.kɔntrə'diktəri]

想一想再看

adj. 矛盾的 n. 矛盾

联想记忆
abrasive [ə'breisiv]

想一想再看

n. 磨料 adj. 磨损的,生硬粗暴的,恼人的

联想记忆
definite ['definit]

想一想再看

adj. 明确的,确切的,有把握的

联想记忆
expose [ik'spəuz]

想一想再看

vt. 揭露,使暴露,使曝光,使面临

联想记忆
infamous ['infəməs]

想一想再看

adj. 无耻的,臭名昭著的

联想记忆
prominent ['prɔminənt]

想一想再看

adj. 杰出的,显著的,突出的

联想记忆
characteristic [.kæriktə'ristik]

想一想再看

adj. 特有的,典型的
n. 特性,特征,特

 
reveal [ri'vi:l]

想一想再看

vt. 显示,透露
n. (外墙与门或窗之间的

 
contradict [.kɔntrə'dikt]

想一想再看

vt. 反驳,与 ... 矛盾

联想记忆

发布评论我来说2句

    最新文章

    可可英语官方微信(微信号:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英语学习资料.

    添加方式1.扫描上方可可官方微信二维码。
    添加方式2.搜索微信号ikekenet添加即可。