1. What's your idea of the medical experiment conducted on animals?
对于自然保护主义者而言，动物生命和人类生命都应当得到尊重和保护，但如果没有动物实验，人类就不免要大大增加医学研究的代价。因此这个问题不是是与非的问题，而是程度问题，考生能够结合现实做出客观的判断即可。

Candidate 1: Basically, I am against doing medical experiments on animals. First, I'm an animal
protector who loves animals very much. Then I think both human beings and other creatures are the children of our earth, so we are equal and no one can govern the other. We should live in harmony with each other. However, on second thoughts, I think doing medical experiments can also bring benefits to people especially in medical fields. We can develop new methods or pills to save more people's lives by making use of the results of the experiments on animals should be permitted. All in all, the principle is that both man and animals can live better on the earth.

Candidate 2: Maybe a great many people will object to these experiments, but I'd like and have to say "yes" to them. Performing experiments on animals, yes, is inhumane(不人道的，残忍的). Animals and mankind have equal rights. Whereas, nothing but these experiments has brought our great progress in medicine, and nothing but these advances has saved thousands of lives. Experiments are inevitable, necessary and significant to both men and animals. I don't mean that people have rights to experiment on animals, and experimenting on animals doesn't mean making them die. Experimenting isn't fro the sake of experiment but for more lives and for not experimenting one day. They are valuable. Thanks to the advanced medical technology, we can
save more lives. As long as we adopt proper methods to conduct experiment and take good care of test animals, we can reduce the losses to the minimum. Finally, I believe someday we'll not do experiment any more.

动物实验是一个颇具争议的话题，许多人对动物实现持反对态度，而其他一些人却对此表示认同。三位答题者从不同角度阐明了自己的观点，用语流畅，观点清晰。

2. Should animals live in the wild or in the zoos? How can visitors be close to and enjoy real animals?
众所周知，动物离开了自然环境就丧失生存的本能，从此意义上而言，自然环境似乎更适合动物。让游客亲近动物，既要注意安全，又要玩得开心，办法很多，回答得独具匠心更能引起考官的注意。

Candidate 1: I believe all living things are created equally. That is, I except that people should visit animals in the wild, and maybe children or adults may learn to communicate with truly wild animals in the proper way animals may like. And I really hope we can treat animals equally. Maybe we can learn the language that animals use, hopefully.

Candidate 2: In my view, the right place for animal is in the wild, not in the zoos. Animals look forward to friends, freedom, and space just like man. Maybe it's dangerous for animals to live in the wild, but the natural surroundings can improve their abilities. They will become more independent. Although conditions perfect in zoos where animals needn't search for food, they will gradually lose a lot as they rely on people to feed them. In some cases, animals are trained to learn some acts to amuse people, as a result, more and more animals in zoos become unhealthy. Some of them suffer from depression; some eat lots of junk food. I agree with Darwin's theory about natural selection and survival of the fittest(物竞天择，适者生存). So animals should live in the wild which fits them most. In some parts of Africa, visitors are allowed to drive cars around
the forest to stay close to the wild, which I think is a good way to enjoy real animals.

Candidate 1富有想象力，提出学习动物语言的看法，很可爱；Candidate 2从动物的进化论的角度，从反面举例阐述自己反对圈养动物的做法，指出圈养会使动物丧失生存能力，并以达尔文的进化论为自己的观点找出理论依据，最后提出以野生保护区实现动物和人类和谐共处的想法，整体行文流畅，用词准确。