写作参考范文：

范文展示：（仅供参考）
Police carrying guns will not result in a rise of crimes and violence. Instead, it is probably the premise of social stability.

Seeing policemen holding guns may make some citizens uneasy and falsely harbor the view that perpetrators are everywhere. This is typically true in those countries suffering from terrorist attacks, where armed forces are deployed in locations like underground railway stations and airports. Nevertheless, viol once, I believe, must be combated with aii iron fist and gun-carrying in this case is hardly a destabilizing factor.

Firstly, the single presence of guns being hold by specially trained police forces, itself is a deterrent to potential violence. In other words, coraon citizens will think twice before resorting to violence when the are unconsciously aware that violent acts are not allowed and wi 11 surel be prevented at any price in severe cases. Latent robbers or murderers for instance, may be brought to a halt since they arc convinced that the can hardly succeed in the face of professionally trained gun-carriers

Furthermore, police carrying gutis do not necessari ly induce abuse of guns. In some countries Like America，the public may complain gun shots every now and then. However, in many countrics, individuals have no legal access to such weapons. Whi 1st pol ice are permitted to om guns, there are also a range of rules regulating the vise. Put another way, the guns will be effectively controlled and managed，and once in need, they are in the hands of qualified policemen, few of whom are likely to pose a threat to social stability. In China, for exanple，Cong An (Chinese name for policemen, literally Meaning people in charge of pubic security) are al lowed to carry guns under regulated circumstances, and nuns among the co_on people are strictly control led. As a result, there are few gun-shot cases in China.
In conclusion, it is necessary for pol ice for cos to be equipped with guns to deter criminal acts and ensure social order.