评论
打印
Voice 2: Lesley never found out what actually happened to Charles. She knows that people he trusted betrayed him. She also knows that he met with a terrible death. She met people who played a part in her husband's killing. But she cannot prove anything. So what purpose did the film serve? It did not bring about justice for Charles. No one has been punished for his death. Did Lesley just waste her time?
声音2：莱斯莉没有查明查尔斯遭遇了什么。她知道查尔斯信任的人背叛了他。她也知道查尔斯死得很惨。她见了在她丈夫遭谋杀一事上推波助澜的人。但是她什么都没能证明。那她拍摄这部影片的目的是什么？这部影片没有为查尔斯伸张正义。没有人为他的死亡受到惩罚。莱斯莉只是在浪费时间吗？
Voice 1: Lesley is clear about her answer to this issue.
声音1：莱斯莉对这个问题的答案很明确。
Voice 3: "The film is about a woman coming to terms with the death of her husband. It is about telling the story of Rwanda and its people. It is about finding hope. As a Christian I believe that this hope can be found through the love of Jesus Christ. In some small way this film helps people remember the past. But I also hope it will encourage people to build a new future. A future based on love, understanding and forgiveness."
声音3：“这部影片讲述了一个女人面对她丈夫已经死亡这个事实。影片讲述了卢旺达及其公民的故事。同时，这部影片也在寻找希望。作为基督教徒，我相信这种希望能通过对耶稣的爱来实现。在某种程度上，这部影片帮助人们回忆过去。但是我也希望影片能鼓励人们构建新的未来。一个以爱、理解和原谅为基础的未来。”
译文属可可原创，仅供学习交流使用，未经许可请勿转载
