评论
打印
真题回忆：Essay Prompt
>Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your opinion and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
实验范文：OWL Essay
As can be argued, government rules can easily become obstacles to scientific achievements. Usually, most of the world's headline-making scientific discoveries do not come through governmental establishments, admitting that fiscal funding is often essential to helping such success to happen in the private sector. It is false to suggest that the government should carry out and control scientific research because the issue is not only about money but also brains.
Just because public funds matter, it does not follow that the government should restrict that kind of freedom of thinking which is vital to imaginative minds. Apart from that, nothing is more naive than for the government to play the role of police and rule research activities. Yes, freedom—that is how scientific breakthroughs are born. It goes without saying that probably billions of government's money may be needed to carry out research projects in various scientific fields, but it must be considered that great scientists tend to ignore, or even go against the rules. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how many scientific discoveries could have been missed as a result of unnecessary regulations. To put it strongly, control is the death of scientific research.
Scientific research should not be forced in any event. It is because a research problem is less likely to be solved by any apparatus which money can buy than to be solved by the brains of a free head that money cannot always buy. Thus, it does not seem proper for official amateurs to "know" what on earth scientists are doing. Otherwise, it would not be called "research" in the real sense of the word. Trying to heavily monitor scientific brains is perhaps a dangerous attitude since the consequence is always too much foliage and too little fruit. That can explain in part why the government ought to shift most of the pledged fiscal spending from the public to the private sector.
All aspects taken into account, scientific research is two things: billions and brains. With little doubt, the success in a country's scientific discoveries relies on both sufficient funding from the government and on creative minds from private companies in which pure research is worth every penny it costs. All the government has to do is grant money and expect that somewhere, something incredible is going to be known. (Created by Jeenn Lee Hsieh)
这一真题三年来出现三次。针对“科学研究”的雅思实验范文是猫头鹰参考隐形模板写的。一般模板使用不灵是因为与你毫无关系。如果你用自己心思抄录若干常用的套话（或废话），再以DIY拼装具有个人色彩的公式，结果保证胜过跟你不来电的模板。
猫头鹰隐形模板：起3承6转6合3=18句
起——立场不赞成。国家只顾出钱，民间出脑袋。
承——经费。
转——头脑。
合——经费+头脑=科学研究。
别人的模板只可能成为写作低分的跳板，原因是死死板板，顶多凑凑字数，其实格格不入。参考自己心爱的模板，临考必然信心十足，与众不同。
再出名的模板也会误导菜鸟盲目地死背牢记，结果写作成绩还不是与其他菜鸟“埋葬”在一堆。不要抱怨评分考官的法眼不饶人，换成谁看了也觉得不以为然，甚至于啼笑皆非。所以自私一点儿，模板自制自用不外卖，则好处多多。如果新手缺乏零件造模板，刚好供应商猫头鹰存心讨好新手，将陆续在网页上无偿发布试用。
以下预告部分零件。指定品牌：猫头鹰。（更切实际的是自行广泛做阅读，碰到喜欢又实用的话语笔记下来，时而学骆驼消化。熟读自己的笔记，临战考场时自然能够呼之欲出，好句连连，跃然纸上。）
