Congress, which of course Iraq and Afghanistan are not In 2006 Senator Lindsay Graham changed the language of the UCMJ to include.
军事法庭 而伊拉克战争和阿富汗战争显然不是 2006年LindsayGraham 对UCMJ的语言提出
Contingency operations so that it could be applied to Iraq and Afghanistan Graham's stated intent was to expand the extend the.
了质疑 这样一来紧急军事行动就可以被应用到伊拉克和阿富汗了Graham的目的是把UCMJ
UCMJ to contractors and in theory this change would do that but no civilian contractors have ever been charged under the UCMJ no.
扩展到所有合同人员 对法案做出的改变是可以实现这一想法的但是还没有合同人员因为UCMJ
Discussion of changing the law ever took place, the military has never attempted to implement such changes and it's unclear again if it would.
而受到指控 从来没有人讨论过改写法律军方从来没有想过实现这种变化而且它是否符合宪法
Ever pass constitutional muster However there does appear to be significant support for such a move from those in the military in.
还不明确 然而但是军方对这样的举动非常支持 这样做
Order to maintain the strong chain of command and enforce discipline For example westpoint law professor laid out the case for bringing.
有利于加强控制和管理 西点军校的法学教授在谈到把合同人员容纳到
Contractors under the UCMJ arguing that quote "it's perhaps the first axiom of the law that like cases be treated alike, soldiers and civilians accused of like misconduct.
UCMJ下的时候说"这也许是第一条容许相似的案子得到相似处理的法律 犯同样罪行
In alike wartime settings should not answer to different courts, different procedures and different law" However even if such an.
士兵和公民在战争背景下不会被移交给不同的法庭 不同的程序和不同的法律" 即使它是符合宪法的
Application were constitutional it is not clear that the UCMJ would cover contractors working for government.
UCMJ是否会包括除了军事单位外的工作人员或者
Entities other than the military or whether it would cover those working for private corporate companies or foreign governments One more.
它的覆盖面是否包括那些为私人公司或者外国政府工作的人员