评论
打印
Sharp conflicts are now arising. Patients are learning to press for answers. Patients' bills ofrights require that they be informed about their condition and about alternatives for treatment.Many doctors go to great lengths to provide such information. Yet even in hospitals with the most eloquent bill of rights, believers in benevolent deception continue their age-old practices.Colleagues may disapprove but refrain from objecting. Nurses may bitterly resent having to take part, day after day, in deceiving patients, but feel powerless to take a stand.
剧烈的冲突正在出现。病人开始学会催问真实情况。根据病人应享有的权利的规定，医生应将病情和可供选择的治疗方案通告病人。许多医生尽可能向病人提供这些情况。然而，即使在对病人的权益考虑得最周到的医院里，信奉"仁慈"欺骗的医生们继续他们传统的古老做法。同事们也许不赞同，但避免公开表示反对。护士们对不得不日复一日地参与欺骗病人的做法也许深恶痛绝，但要抵制却感到无能为力。
There is urgent need to debate this issue openly. Not only in medicine, but in other professions as well, practitioners may find themselves repeatedly in difficulty where serious consequences seem avoidable only through deception. Yet the public has every reason to be wary of professional deception, for such practices are peculiarly likely to become deeply rooted, to spread, and to erode trust. Neither in medicine, nor in law, government, or the social sciences can there be comfort in the old saying, "What you don't know can't hurt you."
及时对这个问题进行公开辩论非常必要。不仅在医疗业，而且在其他行业，从业者不断发现，自己常处于似乎不采用欺骗手段就无法避免严重后果的困难处境。但是公众完全有理由对职业性欺骗保持警惕，因为这种做法特别容易变得根深蒂固，蔓延滋长，并损害信任。无论医疗界、法律界、政府机构还是社会科学界，都不应从"不知者，不为所害"这句老话中得到丝毫慰藉。
