评论
打印
And here's what he finds he looks at their English scores: the "fast spurters" improved significantly more than any of the other students.
他发现，他查看他们的英语成绩"快速迸发"学生有明显进步比任何学生的进步都快
He looked at their maths scores, because English is not really objective
他查看他们的数学成绩因为英语不够客观
and you know maybe it was the teachers who thought they were better than they were really.
也许是老师们觉得某些学生英语更好
So he looked at their maths, their objective scores.
于是他查看他们的数学，客观的成绩
These students improved significantly more than any of the other students.
这些学生也有明显进步比其他任何学生的进步都大
But here is the clincher: Robert Rosenthal administered once again an IQ test for all the students.
接下来才是有决定性的结果 Robert Rosenthal又对所有学生进行了一次智商测试
And what he found was the students who were labeled randomly so, but who were labeled
他发现被标签为被随机地标签为"快速迸发"的学生
"fast spurters", their IQ increased significantly over the year and maintained that increase in a longitudinal study.
智商在一年间有很大增加 而且在长期研究中保持着增加
Now this is my bog I mean: IQ is supposed to be in your intelligent quotient that you are born with! It's immutable.
这让人不解智商本来是生而有之的 它是恒定的
It doesn't change from the day you were born to the day you die or so they thought.
从出生到死亡时都不会改变或者说他们这样认为
It changed significantly just based the belief that the teacher had in her/his students.
但它却因为老师对学生的信念而改变
Belief as self-fulfilling prophecies.
信念即自我实现预言
What happened in the study?
这项研究说明了什么？
Was it that the teachers were fooled?
老师们被骗了吗？
And suddenly were made to see an illusion? No.
突然产生幻象? 不是的
It was that they were alluded before.
是因为他们之前被欺骗
and the illusion was that they didn't see what is right in front of their very eyes,
幻象是他们看不到就在他们眼前的东西
